by Gary Alterson
In my last post, I spoke about the importance of defining a risk universe in helping align your IT risk program in a manner business executives understand. Another tool to achieve alignment is to define and evaluate risks in a way that is meaningful to your business and provides the intelligence necessary for executives to compare risks and make decisions concerning competing priorities.
In the February 2011 Information Week Analytics Report “Risk Avengers” Erik Bataller and I outline a practical approach to establishing and unlocking the value within an IT Risk Management program. One of the recommendations, defining common risk criteria, can go a long way to facilitating business decisions concerning risk.
By establishing common multiple equivalent criteria for risk analysis, or a common risk taxonomy, organizations can start to align different risks and build a common language for expressing the relative values of different risks. In other words, facilitate apples-to-apples comparisons between risks so that your business can appropriately prioritize.
For example, develop a “catastrophic impact” category by defining multiple impact type such as regulatory impact (regulator takeover), customer impact (places greater than 25% of customer base at risk), business continuity impact (business interruption of > 5 days), or manufacturing impact (productivity decrease of 15%). Doing so will allow you to better categorize and compare risks and facilitate more informed business decisions about risk.
Posted by Gary Alterson